Skip to main content

Russell v. Laboratory Corp. of America

NCWORKCOMPCOMMay 21, 2001No. I.C. NO. 638639
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
<center> OPINION AND AWARD for the Full Commission by DIANNE C. SELLERS, Commissioner, and DISSENT by THOMAS J. BOLCH, Commissioner.</center>
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

Plaintiff prevailed on her workers' compensation claim for injury sustained in workplace accident on May 29, 1996. Defendants were ordered to pay medical expenses for migraine headaches and temporary total disability benefits for specified dates, though plaintiff was denied permanent impairment awards and dental damage compensation.

What This Ruling Means

**Russell v. Laboratory Corp. of America: Workers' Compensation Victory** This case involved a Laboratory Corp. of America employee who was injured in a workplace accident on May 29, 1996. The worker, Russell, filed a workers' compensation claim seeking benefits for injuries she sustained on the job, including migraine headaches and other complications from the incident. The North Carolina Workers' Compensation Commission ruled in favor of the injured worker. The court ordered Laboratory Corp. to pay Russell's medical expenses related to her workplace-induced migraine headaches and provide temporary total disability benefits for specific time periods when she couldn't work due to her injuries. However, the commission denied her requests for permanent impairment awards and compensation for dental damage. This decision matters for workers because it demonstrates that employees can successfully challenge their employers' workers' compensation decisions when they believe their workplace injuries aren't being properly covered. Even though Russell didn't win everything she requested, she secured important benefits including medical expense coverage and temporary disability payments. The case shows that workers have legal recourse when they suffer job-related injuries and that persistence in pursuing legitimate workers' compensation claims can pay off, even against large corporations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.