Skip to main content

Union Township Board of Trustees v. Fraternal Order of Police, Ohio Valley Lodge No. 112

Ohio Ct. App.November 4, 2001No. Case Nos. CA2001-01-001, CA2001-01-006.Cited 20 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Powell, Young, Valen
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The trial court affirmed the conciliator's award regarding binding arbitration for employee discipline but vacated the conciliator's wage proposal decision and remanded it for rehearing. On appeal, the court affirmed the lower court's decision on discipline while addressing the FOP's cross-appeal on wages.

What This Ruling Means

I don't have enough information from the provided excerpt to write an accurate summary of this case. The excerpt you've shared doesn't include the key details I need to explain what happened, what the court decided, or why it matters for workers. To write a helpful summary for workers, I would need information about: - The specific dispute between the Union Township Board of Trustees and the police union - What issues were at stake (wages, working conditions, contract terms, etc.) - How the court ruled - The reasoning behind the decision If you could provide the actual court ruling text or more detailed information about this case, I'd be happy to translate it into plain English that explains what it means for workers' rights and employment law. Without these details, any summary I write would be speculative and potentially misleading.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.