Skip to main content

Ogg v. National Union Fire Insurance

Ohio Ct. App.December 17, 2002No. No. 02AP-105 (REGULAR CALENDAR), No. 02AP-114 (REGULAR CALENDAR), No. 02AP-122 (REGULAR CALENDAR).Cited 2 times
Defendant WinUnisys
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Brown, Klatt, Lazarus
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court affirmed the trial court's grant of summary judgment for American Home, finding that Ogg, as a family member of an employee of the named insured, was not entitled to uninsured motorist coverage under the American Home umbrella policy because the policy did not include family members in its definition of insured.

What This Ruling Means

# Ogg v. National Union Fire Insurance - Plain English Summary ## What Happened Ogg filed a lawsuit seeking uninsured motorist insurance coverage under an umbrella insurance policy. The policy was held by Unisys, Ogg's relative's employer. When Ogg was injured in a car accident involving an uninsured driver, he tried to claim benefits under this insurance policy. ## What the Court Decided The court ruled against Ogg. The judges confirmed that the insurance policy's language did not cover family members of employees—only the employees themselves and their immediate household members under specific conditions. Because Ogg didn't meet these requirements, he was not entitled to claim benefits under the policy. ## Why This Matters for Workers This ruling shows that insurance coverage through an employer's policy has strict limits. Family members cannot automatically assume they're protected just because a relative works for a company with an insurance policy. Workers and their families should carefully review what insurance actually covers them—and what doesn't—rather than assuming family members have automatic protection. Coverage depends entirely on how the specific policy defines who is eligible.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.