Skip to main content

Fazio v. Gruttadauria, 90562 (9-11-2008)

Ohio Ct. App.September 11, 2008No. No. 90562.Cited 12 times
Plaintiff WinFrank Gruttadauria$57,572,932 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
MELODY J. STEWART, J.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed judgment in favor of the Fazios against stock broker Gruttadauria, awarding compensatory damages of $19,190,944 and punitive damages of $38,381,988 for fraudulent misappropriation of over $54 million. The court rejected Gruttadauria's arguments that the claims were barred by prior arbitration, statute of limitations, or judicial bias.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** The Fazio family invested money with stock broker Frank Gruttadauria, expecting him to manage their investments properly. Instead, Gruttadauria fraudulently took over $54 million of their money for his own use. The Fazios sued him for breach of contract, fraud, and conversion (illegally taking their property). **What the Court Decided** The Ohio Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the Fazios and ordered Gruttadauria to pay $57.5 million in total damages. This included $19.2 million to compensate for their actual losses and $38.4 million in punitive damages to punish him for his wrongdoing. Gruttadauria tried to avoid responsibility by claiming the case should have gone to arbitration, that too much time had passed to sue, or that the judge was biased. The court rejected all these arguments. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that courts will hold financial professionals accountable when they steal from clients, even when they try to use legal technicalities to escape responsibility. Workers who invest their savings with brokers or financial advisors have legal protections, and courts can award significant damages when those professionals betray their trust and steal money.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.