Skip to main content

Callos Professional Employment v. Greco, 06 Ma 172 (9-17-2007)

Ohio Ct. App.September 17, 2007No. No. 06 MA 172.Cited 1 time
Plaintiff WinCallos Professional Employment, LLC$112,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
DeGENARO, P.J.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The trial court's judgment awarding defendant-appellee Greco the fair value of her shares ($112,000) plus interest was affirmed on appeal. Greco prevailed as a dissenting shareholder entitled to relief under Ohio law.

What This Ruling Means

# Callos Professional Employment v. Greco ## What Happened Greco worked at Callos Professional Employment and owned shares in the company. A business dispute arose between Greco and the company regarding her ownership stake. The company claimed Greco should not receive full compensation for her shares, but Greco disagreed and took the case to court. ## What the Court Decided The trial court ruled in Greco's favor, ordering the company to pay her $112,000—the fair value of her shares—plus interest. When the company appealed the decision, a higher court agreed with the original ruling and upheld the judgment. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case demonstrates that employees who own company shares have legal protections. If a business tries to shortchange employee-owners on the value of their shares, workers can pursue legal action. The ruling shows courts will enforce fair compensation for workers' ownership stakes. This matters for anyone considering employee ownership arrangements or working at companies where workers hold equity stakes.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.