Skip to main content

Final Sossous v. Herricks Union Free School District

N.Y. App. Div.August 31, 2016No. 2014-11777Cited 1 time
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Mastro, Chambers, Roman, Barros
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The appellate court reversed the lower court's denial of petitioner's motion to compel arbitration, holding that questions of procedural arbitrability regarding a settlement agreement dispute must be resolved by the arbitrator, not the court.

What This Ruling Means

# Sossous v. Herricks Union Free School District (2016) ## What Happened An employee had a dispute with Herricks Union Free School District involving a settlement agreement. The employee asked the court to force the case into arbitration (a private dispute-resolution process), but the lower court refused this request. ## What the Court Decided New York's appellate court disagreed with the lower court and sided with the employee. The court ruled that when questions arise about whether an arbitration agreement is valid or applies to a specific dispute, an arbitrator—not a judge—should make that determination. The court reversed the lower court's decision and sent the case toward arbitration as the employee requested. ## Why This Matters for Workers This ruling clarifies that once parties agree to arbitration, courts generally cannot block that process by deciding technical questions about the agreement themselves. For employees, this means arbitration agreements are taken seriously and are harder to escape through court challenges. Workers should understand arbitration clauses in settlement agreements, as they may limit future court access for disputes.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.