Skip to main content

Missouri State Employees' Retirement System v. Raymond E. Salva, Sr.

Mo. Ct. App.August 30, 2016No. WD79289
Defendant WinMissouri State Employees' Retirement System$29,929.2 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment in favor of the Missouri State Employees' Retirement System (MOSERS), upholding the disqualification of Salva's retirement benefits under Missouri Constitution article XIII, section 3.12 and MOSERS's right to recover $29,929.20 in benefits paid.

Similar Rulings

Jimmy Yount v. Keller Motors, Inc.
Mo. Ct. App.Dec 2021
Remanded
Carolyn Holmes, Personal Representative for the Estate of Robert v. Holmes v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Mo. Ct. App.Jun 2020
Plaintiff Win
JOAN KNUTTER, Employee by MICHAEL KNUTTER, Claimant-Respondent v. AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE, Employer-Appellant
Mo. Ct. App.May 2019
Plaintiff Win
LISA COOK, Claimant-Respondent v. MISSOURI HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, Employer-Appellant.
Mo. Ct. App.Oct 2016
Plaintiff Win
Carlos Jones v. Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc.
Mo. Ct. App.Dec 2015
Defendant Win
Read Full OpinionAll Rulings

Browse Related

More government & public sector employer cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.