Skip to main content

Terry Torgerson, Relator v. Mark R. Hellerud, Department of Employment and Economic Development

Minn. Ct. App.December 12, 2016No. A16-372
Defendant WinMark R. Hellerud
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Court of Appeals affirmed the unemployment law judge's decision that Torgerson quit his employment and is ineligible for unemployment benefits. The court found no procedural unfairness and upheld the credibility determinations favoring the employer.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Terry Torgerson challenged a decision made by Minnesota's Department of Employment and Economic Development (the state agency that handles unemployment benefits and job services). This was an administrative appeal, meaning Torgerson disagreed with how the department handled his case and asked a higher authority to review their decision. **What the Court Decided** The available information doesn't specify the final outcome of this appeal. The case was filed in December 2016 with the Minnesota Court of Appeals, but the specific ruling details aren't provided in the case summary. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case demonstrates an important right that workers have: if you disagree with a decision made by a state employment agency, you can appeal that decision to a higher authority. Whether it's about unemployment benefits, workplace safety, or other employment-related matters, workers aren't stuck with an agency's initial decision. You have the right to challenge decisions through the appeals process, which provides an additional layer of protection and ensures your case gets a fair review. This appeals process is a crucial safeguard for workers dealing with state employment agencies.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.