Skip to main content

Teamsters Local Union No. 727 Health & Welfare Fund v. L & R Group of Companies

7th CircuitDecember 21, 2016No. 16-2037Cited 15 times
Plaintiff WinLR System Parking – Illinois, LLC$1,800,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Wood, Easterbrook, Williams
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The appeals court affirmed the district court's judgment in favor of the pension and welfare funds, finding the employer owed approximately $1.8 million in unpaid contributions. The court also corrected a pleading defect by substituting the proper defendant entity (LR System Parking – Illinois, LLC) in place of the non-existent "L&R Group of Companies."

What This Ruling Means

**Union Wins $1.8 Million from Parking Company for Unpaid Worker Benefits** This case involved a parking company that failed to pay required contributions to employee health and pension funds. Teamsters Local Union No. 727 sued LR System Parking – Illinois, LLC (initially incorrectly named as "L&R Group of Companies") because the company owed money to worker benefit funds that provide healthcare and retirement benefits to union employees. The court ruled in favor of the union and ordered the parking company to pay approximately $1.8 million in unpaid contributions to the health and welfare funds. The appeals court upheld this decision, confirming that employers must make these required payments. The court also fixed a paperwork issue by identifying the correct company name in the lawsuit. This ruling matters for workers because it shows that courts will enforce employer obligations to contribute to employee benefit funds. When companies are part of union contracts, they must pay into health insurance and pension plans as agreed. Workers can rely on their unions to take legal action when employers try to skip these payments, protecting their access to healthcare and retirement benefits. The substantial financial penalty also serves as a warning to other employers about the consequences of not meeting their benefit obligations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.