Skip to main content

John Tansey v. Dept. of Labor (Mount Snow Ltd., Employer)

VTJanuary 12, 2017No. 2016-171
Defendant WinMount Snow Ltd.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Vermont Supreme Court affirmed the Employment Security Board's decision that claimant was terminated for misconduct and is temporarily disqualified from unemployment compensation benefits. The employer demonstrated that contacting a TripAdvisor reviewer to complain about a negative review constituted misconduct in substantial disregard of the employer's interests.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** John Tansey was fired from his job at Mount Snow ski resort after he contacted a customer who had left a negative review on TripAdvisor to complain about their review. When Tansey applied for unemployment benefits, the state denied his claim, saying he was fired for misconduct. Tansey challenged this decision, arguing he should receive benefits. **What the Court Decided** The Vermont Supreme Court sided with the state and Mount Snow. The court ruled that Tansey's action of contacting the TripAdvisor reviewer to complain about their negative review was workplace misconduct. This behavior showed substantial disregard for his employer's interests and justified denying him unemployment benefits temporarily. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that workers can lose unemployment benefits if they're fired for misconduct, even for actions that might seem minor. Contacting customers to argue about negative reviews can be considered serious enough misconduct to disqualify someone from benefits. Workers should be careful about how they handle customer complaints and negative reviews, as their employer's policies and interests must be respected. Always follow company procedures for addressing customer feedback.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.