No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Appellate court reversed summary judgment for employer, finding genuine issues of material fact regarding whether the workplace accident arose out of and in the course of employment under the coming-and-going rule.
Workers' compensation coming-and-going rule totality of the circumstances. Trial court erred in awarding employer summary judgment by application of the coming-and-going rule where there were genuine issues of material fact as to whether accident arose out of and in the course of employee's employment.
Worker Wins Right to Have Injury Case Heard in Court
This case involved a worker named Franklin who was injured and sought workers' compensation benefits from their employer, BHC Services. The company argued that Franklin's injury wasn't covered because it happened while "coming and going" to work. Under this rule, employers typically aren't responsible for injuries that occur during an employee's regular commute.
The trial court initially sided with the employer and dismissed Franklin's case without a trial. However, the appeals court disagreed and reversed this decision. The appeals court found there were important factual questions about whether Franklin's accident actually happened "in the course of employment" that needed to be examined more closely. The court said you have to look at all the circumstances surrounding the injury, not just apply the coming-and-going rule automatically.
This matters for workers because it shows that injury cases involving commutes aren't automatically dismissed. Even if you're injured while traveling to or from work, there may be special circumstances that make your employer responsible. Workers have the right to have their specific situation thoroughly examined rather than having their case thrown out based on a general rule. Each case depends on its unique facts.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Workers' Compensation — Causation — fibromyalgia — doctor's opinion testimony The Court of Appeals erred in concluding that competent evidence was presented to support the Industrial Commission's findings of fact with regard to the cause of plaintiff-employee's fibromyalgia based solely on the…
1. Workers' Compensation — Seagraves test — injured employee's right to continuing benefits — termination for misconduct Our Supreme Court adopts the Seagraves , 123 N.C. App. 228 (2003), test for determining an injured employee's right to continuing workers' compensation benefits after being…
1. Workers' Compensation — sale of business — continuing jurisdiction of Industrial Commission An employer who had sold its paper mill and workers' compensation liabilities after an employee's work-related accident continued to be subject to the jurisdiction of the Industrial Commission with regard…
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.