Skip to main content

David R. Smith v. The Tennessee National Guard

Tenn. Ct. App.March 31, 2017No. M2016-01109-COA-R3-CV
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Brandon O. Gibson
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The Tennessee Court of Appeals affirmed dismissal of plaintiff's USERRA reemployment claim against the Tennessee National Guard, holding that the state's waiver of sovereign immunity under Tennessee Code § 29-20-208 applies only to claims accruing on or after July 1, 2014, and plaintiff's 2011 separation event did not qualify.

What This Ruling Means

**Smith v. Tennessee National Guard: Employment Dispute Dismissed** David R. Smith filed a lawsuit against the Tennessee National Guard over an employment-related dispute. The specific details of Smith's complaints against his employer are not provided in the available case information, but the case involved employment law claims. The Tennessee Court of Appeals dismissed Smith's case in March 2017. This means the court threw out the lawsuit without ruling on the underlying employment issues. The dismissal could have occurred for various procedural reasons, such as filing deadlines, lack of proper legal grounds, or failure to follow required steps before going to court. No damages were awarded to either party. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights the importance of understanding proper legal procedures when pursuing employment disputes. Workers considering legal action against government employers like the National Guard should be aware that there may be specific rules, deadlines, and requirements that must be followed. A case dismissal doesn't necessarily mean the worker's complaints were invalid - it could simply mean procedural requirements weren't met. Workers facing employment issues should consult with employment attorneys early to ensure they follow all necessary steps and meet important deadlines.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in David R. Smith v. The Tennessee National Guard from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.