No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The court granted Texas Roadhouse's motion for summary judgment and denied the Department of Labor's motion, holding that restaurant hosts are direct service employees who may participate in tip pools and receive the tip credit toward minimum wage obligations.
Texas Roadhouse Wins Dispute Over Restaurant Host Tips
This case was about whether restaurant hosts at Texas Roadhouse could be included in tip pools and whether the company could pay them the lower "tipped worker" minimum wage instead of the full minimum wage. The Department of Labor sued the restaurant chain, arguing that hosts don't provide direct service to customers and therefore shouldn't be treated as tipped employees.
The court sided with Texas Roadhouse. The judge ruled that restaurant hosts are "direct service employees" because they interact directly with customers by greeting them, seating them, and helping with their dining experience. This means hosts can legally participate in tip pools where tips are shared among staff, and the restaurant can pay them the lower tipped minimum wage (currently $2.13 per hour federally) as long as their tips bring them up to regular minimum wage.
What this means for workers: If you work as a restaurant host, your employer may be able to include you in tip pools and pay you the lower tipped wage rather than full minimum wage. However, your total pay (wages plus tips) must still equal at least the regular minimum wage. This ruling could affect how hosts are paid at restaurants nationwide.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.