Skip to main content

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. McLane Co.

9th CircuitMay 24, 2017No. 13-15126Cited 3 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Wallace, Smith, Watford
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit vacated the district court's order denying enforcement of an EEOC administrative subpoena seeking pedigree information from test takers, holding the district court abused its discretion by applying an incorrect legal standard for relevance. The case was remanded for the district court to consider whether the requested information is unduly burdensome.

What This Ruling Means

# McLane Co. Discrimination Case Summary ## What Happened The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), a federal agency that investigates workplace discrimination, was investigating potential discrimination at McLane Company. During its investigation, the EEOC asked McLane to provide personal background information about people who took company employment tests. McLane refused, and the dispute went to court. ## What the Court Decided A higher court sided with the EEOC. The court found that the lower court had used the wrong legal standard when deciding whether the EEOC's request was reasonable. The court canceled that decision and sent the case back to the lower court to reconsider whether providing this information would be too burdensome for the company. ## Why This Matters for Workers This ruling strengthens workers' ability to challenge potential discrimination. It ensures that federal investigators can access the information needed to properly examine whether hiring or testing practices unfairly exclude certain groups of people. When companies cannot easily block investigations, workers have better protection against hidden discrimination in hiring decisions.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.