Ryncarz v. Belmont Cnty. Court of Common Pleas Juvenile Court Div.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Waite
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The trial court's grant of summary judgment for the employer was affirmed. The employee failed to establish a prima facie case of age discrimination because her replacement was 16 years older, not substantially younger.
Excerpt
R.C. 4112.14 to successfully assert an age discrimination claim, a plaintiff must establish a prima facie case plaintiff failed to demonstrate that she had been replaced by a substantially younger person.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.