Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kotlarsky
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Barbera, Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The Attorney Grievance Commission prevailed in its disciplinary action against attorney Mark Kotlarsky, with the Court of Appeals disbarring him from practice for intentionally failing to disclose pension plan assets in bankruptcy and failing to respond to Bar Counsel's lawful information demands.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.