Skip to main content

Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor v. Action Electric Company

11th CircuitJuly 13, 2017No. 16-15792 Non-Argument CalendarCited 3 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Tjoplat, Pryor, Rosenbaum
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Eleventh Circuit granted the Secretary of Labor's petition for review, vacated the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission's order, and remanded with instructions to reinstate the citation against Action Electric Company for violation of the lockout/tagout standard.

What This Ruling Means

# Court Rules in Favor of Worker Safety Standards **What Happened** The U.S. Department of Labor took Action Electric Company to court over a safety violation. The company had failed to follow lockout/tagout procedures—safety rules that require workers to shut down and secure machinery before performing maintenance. This protects workers from being injured by unexpected machine startup. A lower commission had sided with the company, dismissing the citation. **What the Court Decided** The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the Department of Labor. The court overturned the lower commission's decision and sent the case back with orders to reinstate the safety violation against Action Electric Company. **Why This Matters for Workers** This decision strengthens worker protections on the job. The ruling confirms that employers cannot avoid safety citations for lockout/tagout violations. For workers, this means companies face real accountability when they fail to follow proper machinery safety procedures, making workplaces safer and reducing the risk of serious injuries from equipment accidents.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.