Skip to main content

Service Employees International National Industry Pension Fund v. Tandem Development Corporation

D.D.C.August 16, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-2524Cited 5 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Amy Berman Jackson
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court granted plaintiff's motion for default judgment, ordering defendant to provide payroll records and cooperate with required audits. Attorneys' fees and costs award pending submission of additional documentation by plaintiff.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Orders Company to Turn Over Payroll Records in Pension Fund Dispute** This case involved a dispute between a union pension fund and Tandem Development Corporation over missing payroll records. The Service Employees International National Industry Pension Fund sued the construction company, claiming it had broken its contract by failing to provide required payroll information and refusing to cooperate with pension fund audits. The court ruled in favor of the pension fund after Tandem Development failed to respond to the lawsuit. The judge issued a default judgment ordering the company to immediately provide all requested payroll records and fully cooperate with pension fund audits. The court also indicated that the pension fund could recover its attorneys' fees and court costs, though the final amount was still being determined. This ruling matters for workers because it shows courts will enforce employers' obligations to pension funds. When companies participate in union pension plans, they must follow strict rules about reporting employee hours and wages. These records ensure workers receive the retirement benefits they've earned. The court's decision sends a message that employers cannot simply ignore their pension fund responsibilities, protecting workers' future financial security.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.