Skip to main content

THOMAS VAN ARTSDALEN VS. FRED M. SCHIAVONE CONSTRUCTION(DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, DIVISIONOF WORKERS' COMPENSATION)

NJSUPERCTAPPDIVOctober 5, 2017No. A-3392-15T1
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the workers' compensation judge's finding that the employee suffered a 47.5% permanent partial disability from a compensable workplace injury, rejecting the employer's appeal.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Thomas Van Artsdalen, a construction worker, was injured on the job while working for Fred M. Schiavone Construction. After his workplace injury, Van Artsdalen filed for workers' compensation benefits. A workers' compensation judge determined that Van Artsdalen had suffered a significant permanent disability from his work-related injury, rating it at 47.5% permanent partial disability. The construction company disagreed with this decision and appealed to a higher court, arguing that the disability rating was incorrect. **The Court's Decision** The appellate court sided with Van Artsdalen and upheld the original judge's decision. The court confirmed that Van Artsdalen's injury was indeed work-related and that the 47.5% permanent partial disability rating was appropriate based on the evidence presented. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling reinforces that workers have strong protections under workers' compensation laws when they're injured on the job. Even when employers challenge disability ratings in court, workers can prevail if the medical evidence supports their claim. The decision shows that courts will carefully review workplace injury cases and uphold appropriate compensation for workers who suffer permanent disabilities due to job-related accidents.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.