Skip to main content

Am. Family Ins. v. Phillips

Ohio Ct. App.November 22, 2017No. OT-17-004Cited 1 time
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Jensen
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of American Family Insurance, finding that coverage was precluded under the business-pursuit exclusion in the farm/ranch policy, and the appellate court affirmed this judgment.

Excerpt

Summary judgment for insurer proper where business-pursuit exclusion precluded coverage for losses resulting from insured's failure to control fire during barn demolition for neighbor. Exclusion applied even if work not performed on behalf of insured's employer and despite fact that he waived fee and earned no profit. Negligent performance of project did not render activity "non-business." Reply brief in support of co-defendants' motion for summary judgment was not motion requiring ruling by court.

What This Ruling Means

# American Family Insurance v. Phillips: Court Ruling Summary ## What Happened A man was helping his neighbor demolish a barn without pay. During the demolition, a fire broke out and caused damage. The man's homeowner's insurance company, American Family Insurance, refused to cover the losses, claiming the work fell under a "business-pursuit exclusion"—meaning activities done for business purposes aren't covered by standard homeowner policies, even if unpaid. ## What the Court Decided The court sided with the insurance company. The judge ruled that the barn demolition counted as a business activity, so the exclusion applied. The fact that the man wasn't paid and worked for a neighbor rather than an employer didn't change this conclusion. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case shows that homeowner's insurance policies may not cover injuries or damage that occur during work-related activities, even unpaid volunteer work. If you're doing construction, demolition, or similar projects—paid or unpaid—you may not be protected by standard homeowner's insurance. Workers should discuss coverage with their insurance agent before starting projects.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.