Skip to main content

Kenneth Alford v. Johnson County Commissioners

Ind. Ct. App.December 29, 2017No. 73A04-1702-PL-223Cited 1 time
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Citation
92 N.E.3d 653
Judge(s)
Kirsch
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment
State
Alabama
Circuit
11th Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Corizon Medical Services and its employees on the plaintiff's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claims, finding the medical care provided was adequate and not deliberately indifferent to serious medical needs.

What This Ruling Means

# Kenneth Alford v. Johnson County Commissioners **What Happened** Kenneth Alford sued Corizon Medical Services, a healthcare company, claiming it intentionally ignored his serious medical needs. Alford worked in a setting where Corizon provided medical care, and he believed the company failed to give him necessary treatment or attention to his health problems. **What the Court Decided** The court sided with Corizon Medical Services. The judge ruled that the medical care Corizon provided was actually adequate and not deliberately neglectful. The company won the case without going to trial, based on the court finding the evidence showed no wrongdoing. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling suggests that courts may accept employer explanations about medical care quality, even when workers believe it was inadequate. For employees in similar situations, this case shows that proving an employer deliberately ignored medical needs is a high legal bar to meet. Workers with medical concerns should document their requests for care and gather evidence to support claims of intentional neglect.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.