Skip to main content

Greco v. Department of Labor & Industry, Office of Unemployment Compensation Tax Services

Pa. Commw. Ct.January 4, 2018No. 304 C.D. 2017Cited 2 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Anne, Covey, Dan, Honorable, Pellegrini, Robert, Simpson
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the Department of Labor and Industry's decision that payments from Greco Law Associates to its sole shareholder-officer were subject to unemployment compensation taxation based on his status as a corporate officer, rejecting the company's arguments that the payments were shareholder distributions not subject to UC taxes.

What This Ruling Means

# Plain English Summary: Greco v. Department of Labor & Industry **What Happened** Greco Law Associates, a law firm owned by one person, paid money to its owner and questioned whether those payments should be taxed for unemployment compensation purposes. The company argued the payments were simply shareholder distributions (money going to the owner), not wages subject to these taxes. **What the Court Decided** Pennsylvania's highest business court sided with the state's Department of Labor and Industry. The court ruled that payments to corporate owners who actively work in their companies count as taxable wages for unemployment compensation purposes—regardless of what the company calls them. The payments must be taxed accordingly. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling clarifies that business owners cannot avoid unemployment taxes by restructuring payments as "distributions" instead of wages. Unemployment insurance protects workers when they lose jobs. By requiring owners to pay these taxes like other employers, the ruling strengthens the unemployment insurance system that protects all workers. It ensures similar tax treatment across different business structures.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.