Skip to main content

Service Employees International Union National Industry Pension Fund v. Roseen Realty Corp.

D.D.C.April 2, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2017-0484
Plaintiff WinRoseen Realty Corp.$41,047.53 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Trevor N. McFadden
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court entered summary judgment for the Service Employees International Union National Industry Pension Fund, finding no genuine dispute of material fact regarding the employer's liability for unpaid pension fund contributions and awarding the full amount requested.

What This Ruling Means

**The Dispute** The Service Employees International Union National Industry Pension Fund filed a lawsuit against Roseen Realty Corp in 2018. While the court documents don't provide complete details, this type of case typically involves disputes over employer contributions to employee pension funds. Union pension funds often sue employers when they believe the company hasn't paid required contributions for their workers' retirement benefits. **The Court's Decision** The specific outcome and court ruling details are not available in the provided information, so the final decision in this case cannot be determined from the available records. **What This Means for Workers** Cases like this highlight the importance of employer contributions to pension and retirement funds. When employers fail to make required payments to union pension funds, it can directly impact workers' future retirement security. These lawsuits help ensure that employers fulfill their contractual obligations to contribute to employee benefit funds. For unionized workers, these cases demonstrate how their union works to protect their long-term financial interests, even after legal action becomes necessary. Workers should stay informed about their pension fund status and understand that legal remedies exist when employers don't meet their contribution obligations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.