Skip to main content

Cindy Terry v. Jackson-Madison County General Hospital District

Tenn. Ct. App.June 15, 2018No. W2017-00984-COA-R3-CVCited 4 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Arnold B. Goldin
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Retaliation

Outcome

The trial court found that the employee failed to carry her burden of proof on her retaliation claim under the Tennessee Human Rights Act, ruling in favor of the hospital. The appellate court affirmed the dismissal of the retaliation claim but reversed the award of attorney's fees for sanctions.

Excerpt

A medical product sales representative brought suit against her former employer, a hospital, claiming retaliation in violation of the Tennessee Human Rights Act. After a bench trial, the trial court judge entered a verdict in favor of the hospital, having concluded that the employee failed to carry her burden of proof. In spite of dismissing the employee's case, the trial court awarded the employee a portion of her attorney's fees as "sanctions" against the hospital for making an allegedly late-filed motion to strike the employee's demand for a jury trial, which the trial court granted. We affirm the trial court's dismissal of the employee's retaliation claim, and we reverse the trial court's order granting the employee attorney's fees.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Cindy Terry, a medical product sales representative, sued Jackson-Madison County General Hospital District claiming the hospital retaliated against her in violation of Tennessee's anti-discrimination law. Terry believed the hospital took negative action against her because she had engaged in some form of protected activity under the Tennessee Human Rights Act. **What the Court Decided** Both the trial court and appeals court ruled against Terry. The judges found that she failed to prove her retaliation case with sufficient evidence. While the trial court initially awarded Terry some attorney's fees as a penalty against the hospital for allegedly being late with certain legal procedures, the appeals court reversed that decision, meaning Terry received no money at all. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights how challenging retaliation claims can be to win. Workers who believe they've faced retaliation must gather strong evidence to prove their case in court. Simply believing retaliation occurred isn't enough—you need documentation and clear proof that connects your protected activity to the negative treatment you received. Workers should keep detailed records of any incidents and consider consulting with employment attorneys early if they suspect retaliation.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Retaliation cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.