Skip to main content

Hipsher v. Los Angeles County Employees etc.

Cal. Ct. App.June 19, 2018No. B276486
Mixed ResultLos Angeles County
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful TerminationBreach of Contract

Outcome

The court affirmed that section 7522.72 is constitutional and that the employer may forfeit pension benefits for job-related felony convictions, but reversed in part to require the County to provide adequate due process protections (notice, opportunity to be heard, and written decision) before reducing the employee's retirement benefits.

What This Ruling Means

Hipsher v. Los Angeles County Employees: Court Ruling Summary

What Happened

Hipsher, a Los Angeles County employee, faced losing pension benefits after being convicted of a felony related to his job. The county relied on a state law allowing employers to take away retirement benefits from workers convicted of job-related felonies.

What the Court Decided

The court agreed that the state law itself was valid—employers can legally reduce or eliminate pension benefits for workers convicted of felonies connected to their work. However, the court found the county had not followed proper procedures. Before taking away Hipsher's benefits, the county had to give him adequate notice, a fair hearing where he could respond, and a written explanation of the decision.

Why This Matters for Workers

While employers can potentially forfeit retirement benefits for job-related felony convictions, this ruling protects workers by requiring fair treatment before losing benefits. Workers must receive notice about what might happen, a chance to tell their side of the story, and a clear written decision—not just an announcement that benefits are gone. This ensures workers aren't unfairly stripped of retirement security without proper procedures.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.