Skip to main content

Michael O'Brian v. Rutherford County Board Of Education

Tenn. Ct. App.July 31, 2018No. M2017-00527-COA-R3-CV
Defendant WinRutherford County Board Of Education
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Richard H. Dinkins
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal from trial court dismissal affirmed

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Appellate court affirmed trial court's dismissal, holding that the instructor's actions of pulling a stool from beneath a student were outside the scope of employment, thereby preserving the Board's governmental immunity from suit.

Excerpt

This action arises out of an incident in which an instructor with the Eagleville High School's Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps pulled a stool from beneath a student participant in a JROTC competition while the student was sitting on it, causing injury to the student. The student's parents brought suit against the Rutherford County Board of Education under the Tennessee Governmental Tort Liability Act to recover for her injuries. Following a trial, the court dismissed the suit, holding that the instructor's actions were not within the scope of his employment, and therefore, the Board's immunity from suit was not removed. Plaintiffs appeal. We conclude that the evidence does not preponderate against the trial court's holding that the instructor acted outside the scope of his employment, and as a consequence, the Board retained immunity from suit. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** A high school JROTC instructor pulled a stool out from under a student during a competition, causing the student to fall and get injured. The student's parents sued the Rutherford County Board of Education, claiming the school district was responsible for the instructor's actions that hurt their child. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled in favor of the school board and dismissed the lawsuit. The court found that when the instructor pulled the stool from under the student, he was acting outside the scope of his job duties. Because his actions weren't part of his official work responsibilities, the school board kept its governmental immunity—meaning it couldn't be sued for what happened. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows how courts determine whether employers are liable for their employees' actions. When workers act outside their job duties, especially in ways that cause harm, their employers may not be held responsible. For public employees like teachers, this protection can be even stronger due to governmental immunity. However, this doesn't protect the individual employee—they could still face personal consequences for inappropriate actions, even if their employer isn't held liable.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.