Skip to main content

Kevin Geheb v. TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, L.P.

Tex. App.—9th Dist.October 4, 2018No. 09-17-00107-CV
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court affirmed summary judgment for TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, holding that the 2013 Release signed by the plaintiff conclusively covered all claims asserted in the lawsuit, including claims for failure to restore the surface of the farm.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker Signs Release, Loses Right to Sue Employer Later** Kevin Geheb worked with TransCanada Keystone Pipeline and had a dispute over damage to his farm property. Geheb claimed the company failed to properly restore his farmland after pipeline work and sued for several issues including breach of contract, fraud, and interference with his business. The key issue was that in 2013, Geheb had signed a legal release document with TransCanada. This release was meant to settle any disputes between them. When Geheb later tried to sue the company, TransCanada argued that the release prevented him from filing the lawsuit. The Texas Court of Appeals agreed with TransCanada. The court ruled that the 2013 release Geheb signed covered all the claims he was now trying to make in his lawsuit, including his complaints about the farm restoration work. Because of this release, the court threw out Geheb's case entirely. **What this means for workers:** Be very careful before signing any release or settlement agreement with your employer. These documents can prevent you from suing later, even for problems you discover after signing. Consider getting legal advice before agreeing to any release, as it may permanently limit your rights to seek compensation for workplace issues.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Kevin Geheb v. TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, L.P. from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.