Skip to main content

Dallas Area Rapid Transit and Nancy K. Johnson v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local No. 1338

Tex. App.—5th Dist.December 14, 2018No. 05-17-01051-CV
Mixed ResultDallas Area Rapid Transit$16,156.01 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The appellate court reversed the trial court's $2.52 million damages award for past injury to reputation but affirmed and modified the award of $16,156.01 in out-of-pocket costs to the union.

What This Ruling Means

**Dallas Transit Worker Union Case** This case involved a dispute between Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART), one of its employees Nancy K. Johnson, and the local transit workers' union, Amalgamated Transit Union Local No. 1338. The specific details of what triggered the disagreement between these parties are not fully available from the court records. The case was decided by a Texas appeals court in December 2018, but the specific outcome and reasoning behind the court's decision are not detailed in the available information. No monetary damages were reported as part of the resolution. **What This Means for Workers:** While the specific details aren't clear, this case highlights the complex relationships that can exist between public transit employers, their workers, and the unions that represent them. Transit workers should understand that disputes involving their employer and union can sometimes lead to court proceedings that may affect their workplace rights and protections. Workers in unionized environments should stay informed about legal matters involving their union and employer, as these cases can potentially impact working conditions, benefits, or representation rights. If you're a transit worker facing workplace issues, consider consulting with your union representative or an employment attorney for guidance specific to your situation.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Dallas Area Rapid Transit and Nancy K. Johnson v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local No. 1338 from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.