Parrish v. Cavaliers Holding, L.L.C.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Celebrezze
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The appellate court affirmed summary judgment in favor of Cavaliers Holding, finding that the employee's slip-and-fall injury while walking through a connecting walkway to work was not compensable under workers' compensation law because it did not occur within the 'zone of employment' or satisfy other exceptions to the 'coming-and-going rule.'
Excerpt
Civ.R. 56 summary judgment R.C. 4123.01(C) workers' compensation benefits "coming-and-going rule" "zone of employment" totality of the circumstances. The trial court correctly found that Parrish was not entitled to workers' compensation benefits, and properly granted appellee's motion for summary judgment and denied Parrish's partial motion for summary judgment. Parrish was not within the "zone of employment" when he was injured. Further, there is no causal connection between Parrish's injury and his employment based upon the totality of the circumstances surrounding the accident.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.