Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Johnson

Md.January 22, 2019No. 36ag/17Cited 3 times

Defendant WinJohnson

Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s): Barbera, Greene, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty, Adkins
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling: Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached: default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Court of Appeals upheld the disbarment of attorney Jerome P. Johnson for violations of Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct including failure to manage his attorney trust account, failure to maintain required records, and failure to respond to Bar Counsel's lawful demands for information.

What This Ruling Means

# Maryland Court Ruling: Attorney Grievance Commission v. Johnson ## What Happened The Maryland Attorney Grievance Commission brought a case against lawyer Jerome P. Johnson, accusing him of serious misconduct. The charges included mismanaging client money held in a trust account, failing to keep proper records, and ignoring official requests from Bar Counsel for information about his practices. ## What the Court Decided Maryland's highest court upheld the decision to disbar Johnson, meaning he permanently lost his license to practice law. The court found he had violated multiple professional conduct rules that all lawyers must follow. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case reminds workers that lawyers handling their legal cases and money can face serious consequences for misconduct. The ruling shows the legal system has enforcement mechanisms to protect clients. If a lawyer mishandles your case funds, doesn't keep records, or ignores official inquiries, the Bar Association can investigate and take action—including removing their ability to practice law entirely. This protects workers from financial fraud and negligent legal representation.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Johnson from the same court.

Jul 28, 2017

No. Misc. Docket AG No. 129, Sept. Term, 2016

Read Full Opinion More Johnson Rulings All Rulings

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My Rights Learn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.