Skip to main content

Rosalyn Small v. Memphis-Shelby County Airport Authority

Tenn. Ct. App.March 25, 2019No. W2018-01461-COA-R3-CV
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Kenny Armstrong
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Excerpt

This is the second appeal of this wrongful termination of employment case. Appellant/Employee appeals the amount of post judgment interest awarded. Because the trial court's order does not comply with Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 52.01, we cannot conduct a meaningful review. As such, we vacate and remand.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Rosalyn Small sued the Memphis-Shelby County Airport Authority for wrongful termination, claiming she was illegally fired from her job. This case had already been through the court system once before, but Small appealed again - this time specifically challenging how much post-judgment interest she should receive on any money awarded to her. **What the Court Decided** The appeals court did not make a final decision on Small's case. Instead, they sent it back to the lower court because the trial judge failed to follow proper court rules when writing their decision. Specifically, the judge didn't include enough detail or explanation in their ruling, making it impossible for the appeals court to properly review what happened. The appeals court vacated (canceled) the previous decision and ordered a new review. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that even when workers win employment cases, the legal process can be lengthy and complicated. Courts must follow specific procedures when making decisions, and if they don't, cases can get delayed further. For workers pursuing wrongful termination claims, this demonstrates the importance of having proper legal representation to navigate complex procedural requirements and ensure courts follow the rules correctly.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.