Skip to main content

Fresno Cnty. Employees' Ret. Ass'n v. Isaacson/Weaver Family Trust

2nd CircuitMay 23, 2019No. 17-2662-cvCited 33 times
Plaintiff WinBioScrip, Inc.$2,725,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Jacobs, Pooler, Wesley
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Second Circuit affirmed the district court's decision awarding class counsel a 25% percentage fee ($2,725,000) from a common settlement fund in a securities class action, rejecting the objector's argument that statutory fee-shifting provisions would limit fees to the unenhanced lodestar amount.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involved a dispute over attorney fees in a securities class action lawsuit. The Fresno County Employees' Retirement Association and other investors sued BioScrip, Inc. over securities violations. After reaching a settlement, disagreement arose about how much the lawyers representing the class should be paid from the settlement fund. An objector argued that the attorneys' fees should be limited to a basic calculation method, rather than allowing a percentage of the total settlement. **What the Court Decided** The Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the lower court's decision to award the class action lawyers 25% of the settlement fund, totaling $2,725,000 in attorney fees. The court rejected arguments that would have limited the lawyers to lower, statutorily-calculated fees, allowing them to receive the percentage-based payment instead. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling is significant for workers who participate in class action lawsuits, particularly those involving retirement funds or employee benefit plans. The decision ensures that attorneys can receive substantial percentage-based fees from settlements, which helps incentivize lawyers to take on complex cases against large corporations. This makes it more likely that workers will have access to quality legal representation when pursuing group lawsuits against employers over securities fraud or other violations affecting their retirement savings.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.