Skip to main content

Sec'y Labor v. Timberline S., LLC

6th CircuitMay 29, 2019No. 18-1763Cited 54 times
Plaintiff WinTimberline South, LLC$878,874.84 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Sutton, White, Donald
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Secretary of Labor prevailed on liability for FLSA violations. The Sixth Circuit affirmed the district court's finding that Timberline was a covered enterprise and liable for unpaid overtime, but vacated and remanded the damages award because the district court improperly included ordinary commute time and meal periods in the overtime calculation.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Rules Against Company for Not Paying Overtime** This case involved Timberline South, LLC, a company that failed to properly pay workers overtime wages as required by federal law. The Department of Labor sued the company, claiming it violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by not paying time-and-a-half for hours worked over 40 per week. The court ruled in favor of the workers and against Timberline South. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals confirmed that the company was required to follow federal wage laws and was indeed liable for not paying proper overtime. However, the court sent the case back to a lower court to recalculate the damages because the original award incorrectly included regular commute time and meal breaks when calculating overtime hours. This decision matters for workers because it reinforces that employers must follow federal overtime rules. Companies cannot simply ignore the requirement to pay time-and-a-half for overtime hours. However, the ruling also clarifies that not all time counts as work time—regular commuting and meal periods typically don't count toward overtime calculations. Workers should understand their rights to overtime pay while knowing that certain non-work activities aren't included in those calculations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.