Skip to main content

John M. Donohue v. Bandera County Law Enforcement Personnel: Daniel R. Butts, J.J. Martinez, Gerald Johnson, Rod Chalmers, D.J. Nowlin, Ernest Ferniz, Luis Moreno, Kim Manglberger, Chris Ahumada, Shane Merritt, Jose Hernandez, Matt Hernandez, Birdie Tyler Boerne Police Department Personnel: Pablo Morales San Antonio Police Department Personnel: Perla Dominguez and Kevin Nakata Denice Martinez and Martha L. Donohue

Tex. App.—4th Dist.June 12, 2019No. 04-19-00273-CV
DismissedBandera County Law Enforcement and San Antonio Police Department
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Appellate court issued a procedural order regarding vexatious litigant declaration, requiring appellant to file proof of permission to appeal additional orders or a brief on the vexatious litigant issue within 30 days or face dismissal.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in John M. Donohue v. Bandera County Law Enforcement Personnel: Daniel R. Butts, J.J. Martinez, Gerald Johnson, Rod Chalmers, D.J. Nowlin, Ernest Ferniz, Luis Moreno, Kim Manglberger, Chris Ahumada, Shane Merritt, Jose Hernandez, Matt Hernandez, Birdie Tyler Boerne Police Department Personnel: Pablo Morales San Antonio Police Department Personnel: Perla Dominguez and Kevin Nakata Denice Martinez and Martha L. Donohue from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.