Skip to main content

Jurijus Kadamovas v. John Caraway

7th CircuitAugust 20, 2019No. 19-1230
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Per Curiam
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Failure to Accommodate

Outcome

The court affirmed summary judgment for the defendants, rejecting the inmate's claims that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs related to asthma exacerbated by secondhand smoke and chemical gas exposure.

What This Ruling Means

**Prison Worker's Asthma Accommodation Request Denied by Court** This case involved Jurijus Kadamovas, who worked at a Federal Correctional Complex and suffered from asthma that was made worse by secondhand smoke and chemical gas exposure at his workplace. Kadamovas claimed that prison officials failed to properly accommodate his medical condition and were deliberately ignoring his serious health needs, which he argued violated his rights under disability laws. The court ruled against Kadamovas and sided with the prison officials. The judges affirmed a summary judgment, which means they agreed with a lower court's decision to dismiss the case without a full trial. The court found that Kadamovas had not provided sufficient evidence to prove that the prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs. This ruling matters for workers because it shows how difficult it can be to win accommodation cases against government employers, particularly in correctional settings. Workers with medical conditions like asthma need strong documentation and evidence to prove their employers are failing to provide reasonable accommodations. The case highlights the importance of thoroughly documenting requests for workplace accommodations and any employer responses or lack thereof.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Similar Rulings

Jurijus Kadamovas v. John Caraway
7th CircuitAug 2019
Defendant Win
Jurijus Kadamovas v. John Caraway
7th CircuitAug 2019
Defendant Win
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Remanded
People in re S.L. and A.L
COLOCTAPPDec 2017

The Rio Blanco County Department of Human Services (Department) became involved with the parents in this case as a result of concerns about the children's welfare due to the condition of the family home, the parents' use of methamphetamine, and criminal cases involving the parents. Attempts at voluntary services failed, and on the Department's petition for dependency and neglect, the district court ultimately terminated the parents' rights. On appeal, the parents contended that the Department failed to make reasonable efforts to reunify them with their children. Specifically, the parents contended that the Department did not give them sufficient time to complete the services under their treatment plans and failed to accommodate their drug testing needs. The termination hearing was not held until more than a year after the motion to terminate was filed. For nine months before the motion to terminate was filed, the Department provided numerous services to the parents, including substance abuse therapy, therapeutic visitation supervision, drug abuse monitoring, and a parental capacity evaluation. The Department also provided counseling for the children. Both parents missed drug tests and tested positive during the testing period, and both were arrested for possession of methamphetamine during the pendency of the case. The Department made reasonable accommodations to meet the parents' needs and the parents had sufficient time to comply with their treatment plans. The record supports the trial court's findings that termination was appropriate because (1) the court-approved appropriate treatment plan had not been complied with by the parents or had not been successful in rehabilitating them (2) the parents were unfit and (3) the conduct or condition of the parents was unlikely to change within a reasonable time. Father also contended that the trial court's decision to interview the 9-year-old twin children together in chambers fundamentally and seriously affected the basi

Defendant Win
Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County
9th CircuitSep 2003
Plaintiff Win

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.