Skip to main content

State ex rel. Reisinger v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Ct. App.August 20, 2019No. 18AP-621
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Sadler
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
State
Ohio

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Court denied writ of mandamus, upholding the Industrial Commission's denial of temporary total disability compensation on the basis that relator voluntarily abandoned his employment by violating written safety work rules.

Excerpt

Commission did not abuse its discretion in denying relator's TTD application because the record supported the commission's ruling that relator voluntarily abandoned his employment when he violated the employer's written work rules resulting in discharge. Writ denied.

What This Ruling Means

**What happened:** A worker was fired for breaking his employer's written work rules and then applied for temporary total disability (TTD) benefits through Ohio's workers' compensation system. The Industrial Commission denied his application, saying he had voluntarily abandoned his job by violating the workplace rules. The worker challenged this decision in court. **What the court decided:** The Ohio Court of Appeals sided with the Industrial Commission. The court ruled that the Commission was right to deny the worker's disability benefits because he had voluntarily abandoned his employment when he broke the company's written rules, which led to his firing. **Why this matters for workers:** This case shows that workers who are fired for violating company policies may not be eligible for certain workers' compensation benefits, even if they later develop a disability. The key issue was whether the worker "voluntarily abandoned" his job. When workers break written workplace rules and get fired as a result, courts and workers' compensation agencies may view this as the worker choosing to leave their job, rather than being wrongfully terminated. This can affect eligibility for ongoing benefits under workers' compensation.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.