Vodovskaia-Scandura v. Hartford Headache Center, LLC
Case Details
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- summary judgment
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Summary judgment granted in part. Defendants prevailed on ten of twelve counts and on their counterclaim (deemed time-barred by plaintiff's concession). The court allowed plaintiff to proceed on intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligence claims, denying defendants' summary judgment motion as to those two counts.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Vodovskaia-Scandura from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.