Skip to main content

Raymond M. Cornwell v. Electra Central Credit Union James E. Sharp

9th CircuitMarch 1, 2006No. 04-35408Cited 460 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Fisher, Gould, Bea
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationHostile Work Environment

Outcome

The district court's summary judgment in favor of Electra Central Credit Union and Jim Sharp on retaliation and race discrimination claims was affirmed in part and reversed in part on appeal, but the plaintiff ultimately did not prevail on the core claims.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Raymond Cornwell, an employee at Electra Central Credit Union, sued his employer and supervisor Jim Sharp claiming he faced racial discrimination, retaliation, and a hostile work environment. Cornwell alleged that he was treated unfairly because of his race and that the company retaliated against him for complaining about the discrimination. **What the Court Decided** The case went through multiple levels of court review. A lower court initially ruled in favor of the credit union and Sharp on most claims through summary judgment (meaning the court decided without a full trial). When Cornwell appealed, the appeals court partially reversed some aspects of the lower court's decision, giving him another chance on certain issues. However, Cornwell ultimately did not win on his main discrimination and retaliation claims. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows both the challenges and possibilities in workplace discrimination cases. While Cornwell didn't succeed with his claims, the fact that an appeals court gave him a second look on some issues demonstrates that discrimination cases can have multiple stages of review. Workers should know that even if they lose initially, there may be opportunities to appeal, though success isn't guaranteed.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.