Skip to main content

Service Employees International Union National Industry Pension Fund v. Hebrew Homes Health Network, Inc.

D.D.C.September 12, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2017-1215
Plaintiff WinHebrew Homes Health Network, Inc.$847,290.62 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Trevor N. McFadden
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and granted in part the Fund's cross-motion for summary judgment, denying the employer defendants' motion. The court found that the Fund's ERISA claims for delinquent pension contributions were timely and that Amendment Three establishing the applicable statute of limitations was binding on the employers.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Pension Fund vs. Hebrew Homes Health Network** This case involved a dispute between a union pension fund and Hebrew Homes Health Network, a healthcare employer. The Service Employees International Union National Industry Pension Fund sued the company, likely over unpaid pension contributions that employers are required to make for their unionized workers. These contributions fund retirement benefits for employees who are union members. The court dismissed the pension fund's lawsuit against Hebrew Homes Health Network. This means the court rejected the union's claims, though the specific reasons for dismissal aren't detailed in the available information. No monetary damages were awarded to either side. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights the ongoing challenges unions face in ensuring employers meet their pension obligations. When employers fail to make required pension contributions, it can jeopardize workers' retirement security. While this particular lawsuit was unsuccessful, it demonstrates that union pension funds actively monitor and pursue legal action when they believe employers aren't fulfilling their contractual duties. Workers in unionized positions should stay informed about their pension benefits and understand that their union representatives work to protect these benefits through legal channels when necessary, even though such efforts don't always succeed in court.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.