Skip to main content

Steven G. Hopkins v. Department Of Labor & Industries

Wash. Ct. App.December 3, 2019No. 51891-1
Defendant WinWashington State Department of Labor and Industries$60,193.73 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court affirmed the Department of Labor and Industries' assessment of personal liability against Hopkins for unpaid workers' compensation premiums, holding that the statute of limitations was triggered by the company's dissolution rather than the original premium due dates.

What This Ruling Means

**Hopkins v. Department of Labor & Industries - Case Summary** This case involved Steven G. Hopkins in a legal dispute with Washington State's Department of Labor & Industries in December 2019. The Department of Labor & Industries is the state agency responsible for workplace safety, workers' compensation, and enforcing employment laws in Washington. Unfortunately, the available court records don't provide enough detail to explain what specific employment issue Hopkins was challenging or what led to this dispute with the state agency. The case outcome and court's reasoning are also not included in the public information currently accessible. **What This Means for Workers:** Even without knowing the specific details or outcome, this case highlights that workers can take legal action against government agencies when they believe their employment rights have been violated. The Department of Labor & Industries, despite being tasked with protecting workers, can itself be subject to employment-related lawsuits from its own employees or others affected by its decisions. Workers should know they have the right to challenge government employers in court, just as they would private employers, when workplace disputes arise. However, the limited information available makes it impossible to draw specific lessons about employment rights from this particular case.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.