Skip to main content

Brown v. Fayetteville State Univ.

N.C. Ct. App.January 7, 2020No. 19-13
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

Although the ALJ found FSU lacked just cause to terminate the employee for theft, the court upheld application of the after-acquired evidence doctrine, barring reinstatement and front pay and limiting back pay to the 14-day period between termination and discovery of the employee's falsified job application.

Excerpt

Career State employee After-acquired-evidence doctrine (McKennon rule) Procedural due process requirements.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** A state employee at Fayetteville State University was fired for alleged theft. The employee challenged this termination, claiming it was wrongful. During the legal proceedings, an administrative law judge found that the university didn't have proper justification to fire the employee for theft. **What the Court Decided** Despite finding the theft allegations were unfounded, the court ruled against the employee. The reason? During the case, it came to light that the employee had lied on their original job application. The court applied a legal principle that when an employer discovers an employee lied during hiring, it limits what the employee can recover even if the firing was improper. The employee was only awarded back pay for 14 days (the time between being fired and when the false application was discovered) and could not get their job back or receive future lost wages. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that being dishonest on job applications can have serious long-term consequences. Even if you're wrongfully terminated later, lies discovered during legal proceedings can severely limit your ability to recover damages or get reinstated. Workers should be truthful during the hiring process, as these misrepresentations can undermine future employment rights.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Brown from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.