Jackson v. Commissioner
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- DAWSON,COHEN,CHABOT,SWIFT,JACOBS,GERBER,WELLS,RUWE,COLVIN,LARO,FOLEY,VASQUEZ,GALE,PARR,BEGHE,HALPERN
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- Tax Court decision, affirmed on appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
Plaintiff Jackson prevailed in establishing that termination payments received from State Farm Insurance were not subject to self-employment tax, as they were not derived from a trade or business carried on during the relevant tax years.
Excerpt
P, a former insurance agent for State Farm Insurance Companies, received termination payments after his retirement on December 31, 1987, pursuant to the terms of an independent contractor Agent's Agreement. Held, the termination payments P received were not \derived\ from a trade or business carried on by him as an insurance agent during 1990 and 1991. Therefore, such payments are not subject to self-employment tax under sections 1401 and 1402, I.R.C., and P is not liable for such tax. Milligan v. Commissioner, 38 F.3d 1094 (9th Cir. 1994), revg. T.C. Memo. 1992-655, followed.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.