Skip to main content

Doe No. 1 v. United States

Fed. Cl.April 6, 2020No. 19-1749
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Elaine D. Kaplan
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Motion for Conditional Certification and Notice granted; class certification stage

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Court granted unopposed motion for conditional certification of class action and notice in FLSA overtime pay dispute involving Federal Bureau of Investigation employees.

Excerpt

REPORTED OPINION granting Unopposed Motion to Certify - Conditional Certification and Notice. Signed by Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (feb) Service on parties made. Keywords re Opinion and Order Granting Motion for Conditional Certification and Notice: Conditional Certification Proposed Notice Class Action FLSA Overtime Pay Federal Bureau of Investigation English Monitor Analyst

What This Ruling Means

**FBI Employees Win Right to Pursue Overtime Pay Lawsuit as a Group** A group of FBI employees filed a lawsuit claiming the agency failed to properly pay them overtime wages they were legally owed. The employees worked as English Monitor Analysts and argued that the FBI violated federal wage and hour laws by not compensating them correctly for overtime work. The court granted the employees' request to move forward as a class action lawsuit. This means other FBI employees in similar positions who believe they were also denied proper overtime pay can join the case. The court also approved sending notices to potentially affected workers to inform them about the lawsuit and their right to participate. This decision is significant for workers because it shows that even federal government employees can successfully challenge their employer's pay practices when they believe wage laws were violated. The class action format is particularly important because it allows workers to pool their resources and share legal costs when fighting large employers. While this ruling doesn't guarantee the employees will ultimately win their case, it gives them a stronger foundation to pursue their overtime pay claims collectively rather than individually.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Doe No. 1 v. United States from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.