Skip to main content

Harper v. Ventra Sandusky, L.L.C.

Ohio Ct. App.June 26, 2020No. E-19-056
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Osowik
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

Summary judgment properly granted for defendant where plaintiff failed to establish an employment relationship with the business, as she was assigned through a contractor rather than hired directly.

Excerpt

Grant of summary judgment was proper in employment discrimination case where plaintiff failed to show existence of employment relationship between herself and business where she was assigned to work by contractor.

What This Ruling Means

**Harper v. Ventra Sandusky: Court Rules on Who Counts as Your Employer** This case involved a worker named Harper who claimed she faced discrimination at Ventra Sandusky, a business where she was assigned to work. However, Harper wasn't hired directly by Ventra Sandusky—instead, she was sent there by a staffing contractor. When Harper sued Ventra Sandusky for discrimination, the company argued they weren't actually her employer. The Ohio appeals court sided with Ventra Sandusky and dismissed the case. The court ruled that Harper couldn't sue the business for employment discrimination because she was never their employee. Since a contractor assigned her to work there, the contractor—not Ventra Sandusky—was her actual employer under the law. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling highlights an important issue for temporary and contracted workers. If you work at a company through a staffing agency or contractor, that company may not be considered your legal employer, even if they supervise your daily work. This can limit your ability to sue them directly for workplace discrimination. Workers in these situations should understand who their actual employer is and may need to direct complaints against the staffing company instead.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.