Skip to main content

Matter of Copiague Union Free Sch. Dist. v. Foster

N.Y. App. Div.July 29, 2020No. Index No. 4482/17Cited 3 times
Plaintiff WinCopiague Union Free School District$15,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Retaliation

Outcome

The Appellate Division confirmed the SDHR's determination that the school district unlawfully retaliated against a former teacher by providing a negative employment reference after he filed a discrimination complaint. The court upheld $5,000 in compensatory damages and a $10,000 civil fine.

What This Ruling Means

# Copiague Union Free School District v. Foster ## What Happened An employee filed a discrimination complaint against the Copiague Union Free School District. After making this complaint, the school district gave the employee a negative reference when he applied for a new job elsewhere. The employee argued that the district punished him for speaking up about the discrimination. ## What the Court Decided The appellate court sided with the employee. Judges confirmed that the school district unlawfully retaliated against him by sabotaging his job prospects through the bad reference. The court ordered the district to pay the employee $5,000 for emotional distress, plus additional interest. The district also faced a $10,000 penalty, plus interest. ## Why This Matters for Workers This ruling protects employees who report discrimination. Employers cannot punish workers for filing complaints by giving negative references, blacklisting them, or blocking their job opportunities. If an employer retaliates against you for reporting discrimination, you have grounds to take legal action and recover damages. This case demonstrates courts will hold employers accountable for revenge-based actions against whistleblowers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Retaliation cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.