Skip to main content

Smith, Zackery Steven v. Everidge, Inc.

TENNWORKCOMPCLNovember 27, 2019No. 2018-02-0393
Mixed ResultEveridge, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Citation
2019 TN WC 172
Judge(s)
Brian K. Addington
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
expedited hearing

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Workers’ Compensation

Outcome

Employee won entitlement to ongoing medical benefits with a designated physician but lost claims for past medical expenses and temporary disability benefits. The court found the employer failed to prove its affirmative defense of willful failure to follow safety rules.

What This Ruling Means

Smith v. Everidge, Inc. - Worker's Compensation Ruling

What Happened

Zackery Steven Smith filed a workers' compensation claim against his employer, Everidge, Inc., after a workplace injury. The case involved disputes over who should pay for his medical treatment and whether he was entitled to temporary disability payments. Everidge tried to argue that Smith caused the injury by willfully ignoring workplace safety rules.

What the Court Decided

The court issued a mixed decision. Smith won the right to ongoing medical care with a doctor chosen by the company. However, he lost his claims for reimbursement of past medical expenses and temporary disability benefits—money meant to replace lost wages while recovering. Importantly, the court rejected Everidge's argument that Smith had deliberately broken safety rules.

Why This Matters

This case shows that employers cannot easily escape responsibility by claiming workers ignored safety instructions. However, the decision also illustrates that injured workers don't automatically receive all benefits they request. Workers should document their medical treatment, follow safety procedures, and understand that courts evaluate both employer and worker conduct when deciding compensation cases.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.