State ex rel. Anderson v. State Teachers Retirement Sys. Bd.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Beatty Blunt
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- Petition for writ of mandamus denied on appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The State Teachers Retirement System Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the claimant retirement credit, as evidence supported that the claimant was not employed on a full-time basis during the relevant years. Petition for writ of mandamus was denied.
Excerpt
Respondent State Teachers Retirement System board did not abuse its discretion in denying retirement credit to claimant pursuant to R.C. 2207.53, where some evidence supported the board's determination that the claimant was of service on a full-time basis during the years for which claimant sought such credit. Petition of writ of mandamus denied.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.