Skip to main content

Big Pines v. Baker

N.D.April 20, 2021No. 20200237Cited 3 times
Plaintiff WinBiron D. Baker Family Medicine PC$103,138 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Crothers, Daniel John
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The North Dakota Supreme Court affirmed the district court's award of attorney's fees to Big Pines in the amount of $103,138, finding that the personal guaranty was assigned to Big Pines and that litigation to enforce the lease constituted an attempt to 'realize upon the guaranty' entitling Big Pines to recover attorney's fees.

Excerpt

A personal guaranty allowing the guarantee to proceed directly against the guarantor without first proceeding against the principal is absolute and unconditional. Under an absolute guaranty, the guarantor is liable to the guarantee immediately upon the default of the principal. A decision on an award of attorney's fees rests in the sound discretion of the district court. The Supreme Court and the district courts possess concurrent jurisdiction to award attorney's fees on appeal however a preference exists that the initial determination be made by the district court.

What This Ruling Means

# Big Pines v. Baker: Court Ruling Summary ## What Happened Big Pines entered into a lease agreement with a medical practice owned by Biron D. Baker. Baker signed a personal guaranty—a promise to personally pay if the business couldn't meet its lease obligations. When disputes arose, Big Pines pursued legal action to enforce the lease and collect what was owed under Baker's guaranty. ## What the Court Decided North Dakota's Supreme Court ruled in Big Pines' favor, awarding $103,138 in attorney's fees. The court confirmed that when someone signs a personal guaranty, they are immediately responsible for payment if the main business defaults—the creditor doesn't have to sue the business first. Because Big Pines' legal efforts were aimed at enforcing the guaranty, they were entitled to recover their legal costs. ## Why This Matters for Workers This ruling clarifies that personal guaranties are serious legal obligations. If you're a business owner who personally guarantees a lease or contract, you could be held individually responsible for all debts and legal fees if the business fails. Workers and owners should understand that personal guaranties can have significant financial consequences beyond the business itself.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.