Skip to main content

Cynthia v. Bolinger v. Maria Guadalupe Contreras

Tex. App.—13th Dist.August 5, 2021No. 13-21-00151-CV
Defendant WinMaria Guadalupe Contreras
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The appellate court vacated the trial court's judgment and dismissed the case for want of jurisdiction because the appellant failed to demonstrate a meritorious claim to current, actual possession of the property after vacating the premises, rendering the forcible detainer appeal moot.

Similar Rulings

Baseline Energy Services, LP and Baseline Services LLC v. Billy Tom Martin
Tex. App.—13th Dist.Jun 2026
Defendant Win
Stellar Virtual Texas v. Sandra Aguilar
Tex. App.—13th Dist.May 2026
Dismissed
Phillip Rodriguez v. H.E. Butt Grocery Company, L.P., Jointly and Severally William Tate, Jointly and Severally and as Employee of H.E. Butt Grocery Company Stephen Martinez, Jointly and Severally and as Employee of H.E. Butt Grocery Company Meredith Reid, as Employee of H.E. Butt Grocery Company, Jointly and Severally Debra Ann Godoy, as Employee of H.E. Butt Grocery Company, Jointly and Severally
Tex. App.—13th Dist.Oct 2021
Defendant Win
Adam Schraer v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission & Thomas Suehs, in His Official Capacity
Tex. App.—13th Dist.Feb 2014
Defendant Win
Weslaco Independent School District and Richard Rivera v. Adan Perez Jr.
Tex. App.—13th Dist.Jul 2013
Defendant Win
Read Full OpinionAll Rulings

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.