Skip to main content

Phillip Rodriguez v. H.E. Butt Grocery Company, L.P., Jointly and Severally William Tate, Jointly and Severally and as Employee of H.E. Butt Grocery Company Stephen Martinez, Jointly and Severally and as Employee of H.E. Butt Grocery Company Meredith Reid, as Employee of H.E. Butt Grocery Company, Jointly and Severally Debra Ann Godoy, as Employee of H.E. Butt Grocery Company, Jointly and Severally

Tex. App.—13th Dist.October 7, 2021No. 13-20-00467-CV
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

HarassmentHostile Work Environment

Outcome

The trial court granted the employer's motion for summary judgment dismissing the employee's bill of review petition, and the appellate court affirmed. The court found the employee's loss of consortium claim was not meritorious under Texas law and the employee failed to meet the requirements for bill of review relief.

What This Ruling Means

Based on the limited information available, this case involved Phillip Rodriguez, who brought an employment-related lawsuit against H.E. Butt Grocery Company (H-E-B) and several individual employees including managers and supervisors. Rodriguez filed claims against both the company and specific workers in their individual capacities. **What the court decided:** Unfortunately, the court's final decision and reasoning are not available from the provided case information. The case was filed in a Texas appeals court in October 2021, but the outcome remains unclear from these records. **Why this matters for workers:** This case demonstrates an important legal principle - employees can potentially sue both their employer company AND individual supervisors or managers personally when workplace violations occur. This means that managers and HR personnel can face individual liability for their actions, not just the company they work for. However, without knowing the specific claims Rodriguez made or how the court ruled, workers cannot draw specific lessons about what types of workplace issues might lead to successful lawsuits. Workers facing similar situations should consult with employment attorneys to understand their rights and potential remedies under current employment laws.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Phillip Rodriguez v. H.E. Butt Grocery Company, L.P., Jointly and Severally William Tate, Jointly and Severally and as Employee of H.E. Butt Grocery Company Stephen Martinez, Jointly and Severally and as Employee of H.E. Butt Grocery Company Meredith Reid, as Employee of H.E. Butt Grocery Company, Jointly and Severally Debra Ann Godoy, as Employee of H.E. Butt Grocery Company, Jointly and Severally from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.